In a meeting, you promised the work would be finished by Friday. The people who have to finish it were not in the room. They will learn about your agreement when you change their schedule.
The client is satisfied. The conversation went well. You showed a willingness to accommodate their needs. Only later will someone have to stay late, move a day off, or explain to their family why, once again, they will not arrive when they said they would.
Perhaps all of that is necessary this time. Deadlines move, breakdowns cannot wait, something unexpected happens. But before we appeal to the nature of the work, it is worth checking whether we tried to negotiate. Or whether accepting the request was easier than enduring a few uncomfortable minutes with the client.
When you lead people, your “yes” no longer uses only your own time.
You gain the right to allocate work and speak on behalf of the team. With it comes an obligation to understand what your decisions mean for the people carrying them out. Their time is not an unlimited reserve you can use to cover every agreement you felt uncomfortable refusing.
The manager also stays late, responds after hours, and takes work home. Their exhaustion is real. Still, you can be the last to leave while creating reasons every day why everyone else cannot leave on time. The team may be paying for your delayed decisions, unclear priorities, and promises made without checking.
Sometimes your job is to have the conversation you would rather avoid, before it is too late. To tell the client that the deadline is impossible with the current workload. To explain to your superior what must wait if the new request takes priority. To stop relying on the same people every time because you know they will not leave work unfinished.
Someone may question your ability to “organise people.” They may remind you that others agreed without much explanation. You have enough authority simply to pass the request on. But you also know who will still be on the shop floor tonight, long after the meeting where you accepted the work has ended.
If you choose to protect the good impression you make every time, the discomfort will end up with someone who has fewer opportunities to refuse it.
People see who tried to secure more realistic conditions, even when they did not succeed. Hearing “you have to, that is what was agreed” is not the same as receiving an honest explanation of what happened, what can be postponed, and how the extra burden will be shared. At least then they know someone considered their day before changing it.
This does not relieve the team of responsibility. If the extra burden keeps returning because someone is not doing their job, that conversation also belongs to the manager. The people who step in pay for the delay again.
And when something goes wrong, our decision has to be part of the explanation. If we accepted a deadline despite warnings, we cannot speak to the client only about who failed to finish. If we misjudged capacity, we should say so before judging other people’s effort.
People do not expect a manager never to make a mistake. But they have reason to lose trust when the manager’s part disappears from the story as soon as consequences arise.
Our position allows us to be heard in places where employees may not even be invited. While we speak on their behalf, they keep working, trusting that we know how much they already have to do.
Before the next promise made on behalf of the team, it is worth asking: would I accept the same thing if I had to look every person who will fulfil it in the eye?
If their presence would change our answer, then we already know what we left out of the decision.
Comments