Doubting what we’re not good at is easy. Reexamining what others value us for is much harder. The skill that has brought us results over time becomes part of our reputation. We’re the ones who make quick decisions, who can do everything on our own, or who always have the answer. It’s nice to be recognized for something valuable. Still, we should notice when we start protecting that description even though it no longer helps us act well.
At first, real ability backs us up. We learned the work, found our footing in tough situations, and earned trust. An approach that worked a few times becomes our go-to. That makes sense: experience lets us decide with more confidence. But circumstances change. New tasks, new people, and new responsibilities emerge, and the old approach no longer suffices. In the end, the value of experience depends on how much space we leave for what we have not yet mastered.
A person who has learned to quickly identify a problem may rush to a conclusion even when the situation simply needs to be understood. Someone who has worked alone for a long time may find it hard to accept that collaborative work requires a different approach. Someone who explains things well may keep talking even when a question from someone else could provide more important information. The ability itself remains useful. The problem arises when we apply it before checking what this specific situation requires of us.
This also raises a more personal question. How easy is it for us to admit to people who consider us experienced that we’re still learning something? If we’ve been a pillar of support for years, we may find it hard to bear the feeling that we now need an explanation. We start responding based on what we already know, even though we realize the answer isn’t complete. We maintain an air of confidence, but we miss the opportunity to expand our knowledge. What once opened up space for our growth becomes a boundary we hesitate to cross.
This attachment to a familiar role persists outside work. If everyone in our family sees us as the practical type who always finds a solution, we may struggle when someone simply needs us to share their concern. If we’ve always been confident among friends, we might put off talking about our own confusion. A good quality is given too many jobs. We expect it to guide us through every situation, including one where a completely different ability would be more useful.
There’s no reason to downplay the knowledge we’ve built up over the years. But alongside it, we can develop the freedom to choose our approach. Decide quickly when the situation is clear, and take your time when it isn’t. Act independently on what you’re ready for, and involve others where collective insight improves the quality of the decision. Experience then becomes a foundation for judgment, rather than an obligation to repeat a familiar procedure every time.
Before change, we often must endure a brief period of discomfort: let someone see that we’re asking about something they thought we already knew; give others space to try things their own way; accept a slower start because we’re learning something that may later expand our possibilities. It’s easy to revert to the old ways during this period, especially when we could quickly prove our worth by following a familiar path. That’s why growth sometimes requires us to face the fact that, in a new field, we’re not yet as good as we’re used to being.
It helps to step back and ask which options we no longer even weigh. Did we rule out an approach because it doesn’t fit the task, or because it would force us to start from scratch? Do we really need yet another answer of our own, or does the thought that the answer might come from someone else simply unsettle us? Such questions can reveal where our ability has turned into an obligation to maintain a certain image of ourselves. The answer doesn’t have to lead immediately to a major decision. It’s enough to reopen the possibility.
When the same person takes on different roles, they must also have space to develop new abilities. Consistency lives in how we take responsibility, how we relate to others, and how honestly we acknowledge our own limits. The way we approach a task can evolve alongside what we learn. Such change preserves the value of past experience and allows it to be supplemented. We don’t have to tackle every new task as proof that our previous success remains valid.
I want to use the skills I’ve acquired when they’re needed, supplement them with new knowledge, and set them aside when a task calls for a different approach. Such freedom requires that we stop having to prove our worth over and over again through the same role. Success is already part of our experience. Now it’s time to see what that experience enables us to do next. If, after many years, we find ourselves choosing only the familiar path, we need to ask ourselves how much everything we’ve been through has truly broadened our options.
Comments