An idea that deviates from the norm may encounter resistance before people understand what it is proposing. That's not a reason to immediately reject it, but it's also not proof that it's good just because it seems unusual.
A useful proposal should show what problem it solves, who it is intended for, and how it can be tried. A small test gives both the proponent and their critics something more concrete than arguing about how bold the idea is.
Originality has more room when we accept the possibility of correction. We can save an important part of the idea, but change how we put it into practice. That's how a different view turns into work that someone can actually use.
Comments